Blue_Scholars

[Eggnaug]

Banned 5 days for griefing Booking50

[Booking50]

http://s1359.beta.photobucket.com/user/Booking50/media/2013-01-23_060158_zps557cf6aa.png.html

[l_iamW]

http://s1359.beta.photobucket.com/user/Booking50/media/2013-01-23_060158_zps557cf6aa.png.html

That I and N looks familer

[Booking50]

http://s1359.beta.photobucket.com/user/Booking50/media/2013-01-23_060158_zps557cf6aa.png.html

That I and N looks familer

Yep he griefed your work as well

[TheReasoning]

Fun fact: Booking gave the lamps prior to this occurrence to Blue_Scholars, therefore only taking his own blocks.

I would know because Blue_Scholars was at my house the entire time..-.-"

[Eggnaug]

Fun Fact: Block logs don't lie

[SGT_ADZ]

Egg. He isn't denying he broke them, but he was only breaking his OWN blocks.

[chrisjones23]

If they were on bookings lot their bookings. id check the chstlogs to see if booking said they could be removed

[Booking50]

If they were on bookings lot their bookings. id check the chstlogs to see if booking said they could be removed

I didnt. say they could i keep asking blue if he was gonna do it then next day i saw it was all griefed

[SGT_ADZ]

Ban Lifted. Due to him taking back his own blocks. This doesn't count under the griefing rule.

[Skye]

Once you place a block down on someone elses lot, the block no longer belongs to you. re-banned for 2 days.

[aiden cool6]

Sorry skye but I disagree. Blue was simply taking back blocks that DID belong to him. You see this rule that when someone puts blocks on anothers lot doesn't exsist. And why someone is being punished for breaking a rule that doesn't exsist I dunno.

[Eggnaug]

Ban Lifted. Due to him taking back his own blocks.

This basically saying its okay to build a wall (regardless of size, could be like 100 blocks tall) for someone, then days later change your mind and taking it away, completely ruining the structure.

Also if you argue that it's their block and not the lot owners, you are basically saying it's okay to provide 50 stacks of wood, letting them build a house with it, then going and destroying the house to get your wood back.

Niether of these two situations are okay.

[TheReasoning]

Ban Lifted. Due to him taking back his own blocks.

This basically saying its okay to build a wall (regardless of size, could be like 100 blocks tall) for someone, then days later change your mind and taking it away, completely ruining the structure.

Also if you argue that it's their block and not the lot owners, you are basically saying it's okay to provide 50 stacks of wood, letting them build a house with it, then going and destroying the house to get your wood back.

Niether of these two situations are okay.

So, if you were to place 1 dirt on my lot, then days later you want it back, and I say you can not take it back, yet you take in anyways. I could report you for griefing and you would be banned for doing so.

Flawed logic? Indeed.

[l_iamW]

Ban Lifted. Due to him taking back his own blocks. This doesn't count under the griefing rule.

It sort of does count as griefing though. This is my definition of griefing: Making unwanted changes to structures and since he gave them to Booking they are now his(Bookings)