Recent Bans Concerning the Creative World

[Eggnaug]

Maybe we should have this world be trusted only, instead of openly open to Super+?

Wait, we can't do that because "Everyone must be equal". But wait,

Anyone else needs permission from an admin.

Meaning only certain players have the admins trust to build here? Oh no, that's not treating everyone equally.

Please back yourself up now with your nonsense rules.

I can't trust you if you cant't trust the judgments of staff. Does this mean you shouldn't build in creative now? Your argument seems to say so.

[TheReasoning]

I like the way we have it currently, people who have donated or had someone else donate for them being allowed to creative world.  I personally don't mind checking creative world once every month or so. If a player chooses to grief, let them. All they are doing is getting themselves banned. In the past we have revoked people's permission to use creative world if they have griefed. Also, changing the current system we have gets rid of one of the many incentives for player to donate. And as most of you know, the server runs off the money supplied by donations.

Last time I checked, the server costs what? $120 a month on the high end to run correct?

Goldy = $50. We have ~80 goldies alone
 
$50 x 80 = $4000

$4000/120 = 33.3333 months just of goldies at the moment

The server has been up for just over 21 months now if I remember correct? I think we are fine in terms of keeping the server running.

[Eggnaug]

You haven't included other expenses that Hret pays for.

[TheReasoning]

That is why I set the cost at $120. -.-"

[Vector]

The system is fine as it currently is. Out of ever block build in the creative world, a very miniscule amount has been removed in act of griefing. This won't spark a huge change. We can just simply revoke their build rights, easy as that.

[Nosliw]

The system is fine as it currently is. Out of ever block build in the creative world, a very miniscule amount has been removed in act of griefing. This won't spark a huge change. We can just simply revoke their build rights, easy as that.

Although, we might need to be stricter with removing peoples creative rights? Then again, we haven't had many repeat offenders..

[l_iamW]

You may of not had repeat offenders but there offences are serious enough!!!

[TheReasoning]

Maybe to settle this it would be easier to have a simple Zero Tolerance Policy towards creative grieifing. (I am unaware if this is already in place or not.)

[chrisjones23]

Maybe to settle this it would be easier to have a simple Zero Tolerance Policy towards creative grieifing. (I am unaware if this is already in place or not.)

i thought it already was zero tolerance but i may be wrong

[Nosliw]

I believe that our current approach is that you get a second chance, but after that you will have your creative building rights revoked. However I guess that it depends on the severity of each case, and who bans them, as only Hretsam, AlphaBlend and The_Lynxy have the power to revoke someone’s building rights.

[l_iamW]

I believe that our current approach is that you get a second chance, but after that you will have your creative building rights revoked. However I guess that it depends on the severity of each case, and who bans them, as only Hretsam, AlphaBlend and The_Lynxy have the power to revoke someone’s building rights.

What about you?

[Nosliw]

What about you?

Nope, neither me nor merc have the powers to do that