Innectis - Minecraft Server > Bans

BeastyBoy321

<< < (7/8) > >>

l_iamW:
So he is no longer permanently  banned?

TheReasoning:

--- Quote from: l_iamW on April 16, 2013, 02:58:05 AM ---So he is no longer permanently  banned?

--- End quote ---

Yes, and according to the new banning system, if he makes any more offences in the next while, he shall be (temp)-Perma-banned



And here is my opinion in this ordeal.

Beasty has deserved a permanent ban. Why is this? Because he has now 6 previous bans. One would think another would learn they are doing something wrong after 1, 2, or maybe a 3rd ban, but people like this obviously don't understand what it is to be a positive influence on the community. Also, many people have said recently that the staff seems to be a little "Ban Happy", and I would agree to a certain extent, however in relation to permanent bans, I feel they are extremely lenient.

Here is the definition of Permanent;
"Lasting or intended to last or remain unchanged indefinitely."

Indefinitely does not mean "Until said person has left for an extended period of time" or "Until a few people beg to get their friend unbanned."

And for all the people that decided not to click the link in the original post, here it is for you once again.


--- Quote from: SGT_ADZ on April 05, 2013, 05:11:00 PM ---Banned Permanently for using X-Ray, yet again. In compliance to his last ban http://archives.codespeak.org/innectis/forum/index.php/topic,2209.0.html

--- End quote ---

Looking into that link we see the following


--- Quote from: Skye on February 19, 2013, 07:26:50 PM ---30 days for using X-ray. Next ban will be his final ban.

http://archives.codespeak.org/innectis/forum/index.php/topic,975.msg6335.html#msg6335
http://archives.codespeak.org/innectis/forum/index.php/topic,626.msg3560.html#msg3560
http://archives.codespeak.org/innectis/forum/index.php/topic,1461.msg11113.html#msg11113
http://archives.codespeak.org/innectis/forum/index.php/topic,1878.msg14574.html#msg14574
http://archives.codespeak.org/innectis/forum/index.php/topic,2139.msg17761.html#msg17761

--- End quote ---

SGT_ADZ:
I wanted to keep him perma banned. -.-

hungrybobby1:
Agreed. He should've been perm-banned.
Should this thread be locked?
it has served(ish) it's purpose.

RickTheRuler:
Reasoning, if I could like your post, I would.

Perma should be perma. He had his chance and then he blew it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page